Maine Paddleboarder Sunny Stewart: Teen to Face Adult Trial
Case No. DHF-007 | Subject: Tori Dunn | Date: 16 June 2024 (verdict 21 October 2026) | Location: Port Kells, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada | Status: CONVICTED — SENTENCING PENDING
Posted: 26 October 2026
Status stamp: CONVICTED — SENTENCING PENDING
Image note for readers: All images in this file are original illustrations created for Dark History Files. They are atmospheric artwork, not photographs and not real evidence. No image in this file depicts Tori Dunn, Adam Troy Mann, Trafford Wace, any member of any family, or any real person, and no image depicts the killing or any act of violence.
Caption: Case card for DHF-007 — Tori Dunn verdict, Surrey, British Columbia. Status: CONVICTED — SENTENCING PENDING.
Case File No.: DHF-007
Subject: Tori Dunn, 30
Date: 16 June 2024 (killing); verdict 21 October 2026
Location: Port Kells, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada
Status: CONVICTED — SENTENCING PENDING
Investigating agency: Homicide investigators, Surrey, British Columbia (agency detail as reported; no specific force named in the reporting relied on)
Prosecuting authority: B.C. Crown counsel (as reported)
Conviction: On 21 October 2026, a jury at B.C. Supreme Court in New Westminster convicted Adam Troy Mann, 42, of one count of second-degree murder in the death of Tori Dunn.
One-line summary: A 30-year-old woman was fatally stabbed at her home in Port Kells, Surrey, on the evening of 16 June 2024. More than two years later, a jury rejected the accused man's account of how he came to be carrying the knife and convicted him of second-degree murder. He now awaits sentencing, and the length of time before he can seek parole has not yet been set.
Why this file is stamped CONVICTED — SENTENCING PENDING: a jury has returned a guilty verdict, so "convicted" is now a matter of court record, not an allegation. But no sentence has yet been imposed — the next court appearance, on 29 October 2026, is to schedule a sentencing date — and the parole-ineligibility period within the mandatory life sentence has not yet been set. Until a sentence is imposed, this file will not state a parole figure as fact. If sentencing or an appeal changes the picture, this file will be updated, dated, and re-stamped — never quietly rewritten.
Port Kells is a quiet corner of Surrey, British Columbia — the kind of place where homes sit apart from one another, where evenings are still, and where a police call after dark is unusual enough to be remembered. On the evening of Sunday 16 June 2024, that stillness broke. Police were called to a home in Port Kells at around 10 p.m. Inside, they found 30-year-old Tori Dunn, who had been fatally stabbed. She was taken to hospital, where she later died. Dunn shared the home with her boyfriend, Trafford Wace, who was not charged with or suspected of any offence in her death.
The arrest came quickly. Adam Troy Mann was arrested near the scene that same night. He was not charged at once: about two weeks later, he was charged with one count of second-degree murder. He has remained in custody ever since. That long stretch in custody — from the summer of 2024 to the autumn of 2026 — is itself part of the shape of this case. It was not a case solved years after the fact by a new forensic breakthrough. It was a case in which a suspect was in custody within hours, and the wait that followed was the wait for a trial.
That wait matters for understanding what the verdict in October 2026 did and did not do. For Dunn's family, the trial was not the discovery of who had killed her. It was the public testing of the evidence against the man already charged, and of the account he gave in his own defence.
What the reporting establishes about Tori Dunn herself is, in one sense, painfully ordinary. She was 30 years old. She lived in Surrey with her boyfriend. She was a young woman in the middle of an ordinary life — the kind of life that does not usually end in a homicide investigation.
This file deliberately does not fill in the gaps in that picture with colour it cannot verify. It does not invent a biography, a career history, or a set of hobbies for Dunn from fragments, and it does not reproduce private family material. What can be said, and what matters for the file, is simpler: a 30-year-old woman died violently in her own home on a June evening, and the people who loved her were left to wait more than two years for a court to decide what had happened and who was responsible. That wait — and what Dunn's family did with it, which this file records below — is part of the case, not background decoration.
The distinction matters because true-crime writing too often treats the victim as a prologue and the accused as the story. Dunn is the subject of this file; the verdict is recorded here because it answers, in law, the question her death posed.
Caption: Illustration of a quiet suburban street at dusk — atmospheric artwork, not a photograph of the real location and not evidence.
The sequence of the first two weeks is straightforward: Mann was arrested near the scene that night and charged about two weeks later with one count of second-degree murder.
Second-degree murder, in Canadian law, is a murder that is not first-degree — that is, it is not planned and deliberate in the legal sense. It nonetheless carries a mandatory sentence of life imprisonment. What a judge must still decide is the period of parole ineligibility: the number of years, between 10 and 25, that must pass before the convicted person can apply for parole. That decision had not been made when this file was written, and this file does not anticipate it.
Mann remained in custody from his arrest through to the trial. That frames everything that followed: the man who stood trial in New Westminster in 2026 was a man who had already spent more than two years in custody awaiting that trial. Custody before trial is not a sentence, and this file does not treat it as one.
The trial took place at B.C. Supreme Court in New Westminster, before Justice David M. Layton. Closing arguments were heard on 21 October 2026, and that same evening the jury returned its verdict: guilty of second-degree murder.
The shape of the trial, as reported, was defined by a single piece of physical evidence and by the competing explanations offered for it. The Crown's case rested substantially on a knife. The knife carried Dunn's DNA on its blade and Mann's DNA on its handle. That combination — the victim's DNA where a blade does its work, the accused's DNA where a hand grips — was, for the prosecution, the core of the case.
Mann gave evidence in his own defence. He testified that he had been homeless and using drugs on the day of the killing, and he claimed that he had found the knife by the roadside near Dunn's home. That was the account the jury had to weigh against the DNA evidence: not a denial that he had handled a knife, but an explanation of how he had come to handle it — a chance discovery, by the road, rather than a weapon he had brought to the home for the purpose of killing.
The jury rejected that account. The verdict makes that plain, even though the jury itself gave no reasons — juries in Canada do not explain their verdicts, and this file does not invent an explanation for them. What can be said is that the jury, having heard the Crown's DNA evidence and Mann's testimony, concluded beyond a reasonable doubt that Mann had committed second-degree murder.
It is worth pausing on what that does and does not mean. It does not mean the jury found that Mann had planned the killing in advance — second-degree murder, not first-degree, is the conviction recorded. It does not mean the jury made any finding about why he did it. Motive, in the sense of a reason for the killing, was not established on the court record as reported, and this file states no motive for the killing. A conviction for murder does not require the Crown to prove a motive, and the absence of an established motive is not a gap in the verdict.
Separate from the evidence about the night of 16 June 2024, the reporting on this case carried background about Mann's history that became a significant part of the public discussion — and, through Dunn's family's campaign, part of a wider debate about bail and release in Canada. This file records that background as reported background, attributed to court records and reporting. It is not presented here as a motive for the killing, and it must not be read as one. A person's criminal history explains, at most, how the justice system had dealt with him before. It does not explain a particular killing.
What was reported is this. Mann had a long criminal history, including a 12-year sentence imposed in 2009 for robbery and weapons offences arising from a home invasion. Court records showed two probation orders against him, and a recent release after he had violated one of those orders by possessing knives. At the time of Dunn's killing, he was out on bail while facing a charge of aggravated assault. That last point requires precision: aggravated assault was a charge he faced, an accusation. This file does not state that he committed that assault, because a charge is not a conviction, and the reporting available for this file does not establish a conviction on it.
The fact that Mann was out on bail at the time of the killing, and that he had previously violated a probation order by possessing knives, became the focus of a campaign by Dunn's family. Through a petition under the name Justice for Tori, the family called for a legal review of his release and for changes to the bail system. That campaign is part of the public record of this case, and this file records it because it shows what the family did during the two-year wait for trial. Whether those reforms follow is a question for legislators, not for this file, and this file takes no position on what any particular reform should be.
There is a temptation, in writing about a case like this, to let the background swallow the killing — to write as though a criminal record were an explanation. This file resists that temptation. The background is relevant to the public debate the case prompted, and to understanding why the family's campaign took the form it did. It is not a substitute for the evidence at trial, and it is not a motive. The jury convicted Mann on the evidence about 16 June 2024, not on his record.
On the evening of 21 October 2026, after closing arguments that day, the jury found Adam Troy Mann guilty of second-degree murder in the death of Tori Dunn. The verdict was reported the following day, 22 October 2026, by CBC News, the Vancouver Sun, Global News BC, and Peace Arch News, among others. That breadth of reporting matters for this file's fact-check gate: the verdict itself is not a single-outlet claim. It is a court outcome reported consistently across multiple reputable outlets on the same day.
The verdict closed the question of criminal responsibility. It did not close the case. The mandatory life sentence still requires the judge to set the parole-ineligibility period — between 10 and 25 years — and that has not yet happened. Mann's next court appearance is on 29 October 2026, when a sentencing date is to be scheduled. Until that hearing, how long Mann will serve before he can seek parole remains unknown, and this file will not guess it.
The same restraint applies to appeals. No appeal has been reported as of this file's research date, 26 October 2026, and this file records none. If Mann appeals, that will be a dated update to this file. Until then, no appeal should be assumed, and the verdict stands as the court's answer.
A conviction settles criminal responsibility for the death of Tori Dunn on 16 June 2024. It settles, beyond a reasonable doubt in the jury's judgment, that Adam Troy Mann fatally stabbed her and that the killing was second-degree murder. It settles that the jury did not accept his account of finding the knife by the roadside.
It does not settle everything the case raised. It does not establish a motive for the killing — none is established on the court record as reported. It does not resolve, by itself, the bail-system questions Dunn's family raised; a conviction answers who committed the killing, not whether earlier release decisions were right or what the law should be. It does not undo Dunn's death, and it does not shorten the two years her family waited for the trial. And it does not yet answer the sentencing question: how many years must pass before Mann can apply for parole. That answer belongs to a judge, at a hearing that has not yet been scheduled, and this file will record it when it is given.
What can be said, without overreaching, is this: a 30-year-old woman was fatally stabbed in her own home in Port Kells, Surrey, on the evening of 16 June 2024. A man arrested near the scene that night was charged about two weeks later with second-degree murder, remained in custody, and was tried at B.C. Supreme Court in New Westminster. The Crown's case turned on a knife carrying her DNA on the blade and his DNA on the handle. He testified that he had found the knife by the roadside while homeless and using drugs. The jury rejected that account and, on 21 October 2026, convicted him of second-degree murder. He now awaits sentencing, and the period before he can seek parole has not yet been set. That is the file as it stands on 26 October 2026.
Caption: Illustration of an empty courtroom — atmospheric artwork, not a photograph of the real courtroom and not evidence.
What would change this file: when a sentencing date is set on 29 October 2026, and when a sentence is imposed, this file will be updated with the dates and the parole-ineligibility period, dated, and re-stamped. If an appeal is filed or decided, it will be recorded in the same way. Until one of those things happens, the stamp stays CONVICTED — SENTENCING PENDING, and this file will not be quietly rewritten.
No companion video yet. If Dark History Files' sister channel Curiozoid publishes a video on this case, it will be linked here.
Reader question: The jury in this case had to weigh DNA evidence against the accused man's own explanation of how he came to carry the knife — when physical evidence and a personal account point in different directions, which should carry more weight in a courtroom, and why?
Previous file: DHF-006 — Rodney Hinton Jr. Convicted in Deputy Henderson Death — https://thedarkhistoryfiles.blogspot.com/2026/10/rodney-hinton-verdict-cincinnati-case.html
Next file: DHF-008 — Christin Munn-Holliday: Missing After Bridge Crash
This file is based on public reporting and official statements available as of 26 October 2026. Read how every file is built on the About page, or request a file via the Contact page.
Comments
Post a Comment